Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Stokes v. Mental Health Dept.
as 1:2025cv00550
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stokes
Defendant:
Mental Health Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smothers v. Richardson et al
as 2:2025cv00007
Defendant:
Rodney Brown, Janice Blake, Rolanda Scruggs and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Smothers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood-Cook v. SWVRJA-Duffield et al
as 7:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Brandy Nicole Hood-Cook
Defendant:
SWVRJA-Duffield, Mental Health Dept and Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shupe v. SWVRJA - Duffield et al
as 7:2024cv00798
Defendant:
Mental Health Dept. and SWVRJA - Duffield
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Shupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flint v. Starr et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Defendant:
Medical Memes, Medical Dept. H.S.A. Boch, USP Hazelton Medical Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Louis Flint, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Henry Jones v. Tony Mays, et al
as 24-5966
Plaintiff:
HENRY LEE JONES
Defendant:
JESSIA CALOWELL, TERRY FOSTER, Security/Officer, JAMIE A. DAVIS, Corporal/Security and others
Hood v. SWVRJA-Haysi et al
as 7:2024cv00715
Defendant:
SWVRJA-Haysi and Mental Health Dept.
Plaintiff:
Brandy N. Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1490
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Jordan v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept of Correction, Wilson, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Chief of Security Headquarters, T.A. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
