Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McClain et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv23738
Defendant:
Charles Terrance Canady, Michael Richard Pence doing business as U.S.A. Inc., Gary Gensler Agency Chairman doing business as US Securities Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Terence M. McClain, Linda N. McClain, Edward G. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrie v. Lynch et al
as 3:2020cv02214
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Lawrie
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Smith Inc., Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nagel v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Defendant:
Bill LNU, Charles Tynon, Jose Doorman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Hilton et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. 425 Park South Tower Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Jose "Perez", Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Warren et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Linda Ford, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Diaz et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, John Edwards, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haberman v. Merrill Lynch
as 3:2015cv03346
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Alan Haberman
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haberman v. Merrill Lynch
as 3:2014cv00553
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Alan Haberman
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Haberman v. Merrill Lynch
as 1:2014cv06106
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Alan Haberman
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
