Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MetLife Home Loans LLC v. River Glider Avenue Trust
as 21-15564
Plaintiff / Appellee:
METLIFE HOME LOANS LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
RIVER GLIDER AVENUE TRUST
Tacitus Hall v. Timothy Anderson
as 20-1786
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL SERVICING CENTER, FORD MANUFACTURER, KEITH MICHAEL YACKO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TACITUS ANASTACIUS HALL, a/k/a Tazz Hall
First Mercury Insurance Compan v. Law Office of Kenneth B. Schwa
as 20-53
Counter Claimant:
Kenneth B. Schwartz, Law Office of Kenneth B. Schwartz and Kenneth B. Schwartz, P.C.
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Helene Stetch
Appellant:
First Mercury Insurance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Swango v. Nationstar Sub1 LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01338
Defendant:
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Metlife Bank, National Association, Metlife Home Loans LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Susan K. Swango
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
