Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Lynch et al v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Lynch and William S. Colwell
Defendant:
Metro North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Luden v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Hannah Luden
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Navarro v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
Hector Navarro
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 3:2013cv01825
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lessard v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv01782
Plaintiff:
Barbara P. Lessard
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alcayaga v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv01756
Plaintiff:
Jose Alcayaga
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv01263
Plaintiff:
Lionel Harris
Defendant:
Metro North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fontaine v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Company

as 3:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fontaine
Defendant:
Metro North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rossini et al v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv01171
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rossini and Robert Washington
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones et al v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv00961
Plaintiff:
Chantal B. Jones , Quincy Jones, Jr. and Asanna Bishop
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.