Cases filed in Pennsylvania
MAFLA v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01152
Plaintiff: HENRY MAFLA
Defendant: METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
ROWAN v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv02002
Defendant: METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as ECONOMY PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: MIA ROWAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ELECTROLUX NORTH AMERICA, INC et al
as 2:2015cv00085
Plaintiff: METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: ELECTROLUX NORTH AMERICA, INC and ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
COOPER et al v. METLIFE AUTO & HOME et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00687
Plaintiff: JOSEPH A. COOPER, JR. and SHIRLEY COOPER
Defendant: METLIFE AUTO & HOME , METROPOLITAN CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Langan et al v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2012cv01927
Plaintiff: Sharon Langan and Christopher Langan
Defendant: Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company , Metlife Auto and Home and MetLife, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Davis v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv00515
Plaintiff: Lauren Davis
Defendant: Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
DAVID v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv03307
Plaintiff: BARBARA DAVID
Defendant: METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?