Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Carter v. Henderson
as 4:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Rodney Henry Carter
Defendant:
Michael Kevin Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carter v. Henderson
as 4:2025cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rodney Henry Carter
Defendant:
Michael Kevin Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Henderson v. Garland
as 24-1720
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSHUA HENDERSON
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Dr. ROBERT CALIFF, Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and others
Michael Henderson v. Christopher Vertz
as 24-1697
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. HENDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER VERTZ
Henderson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Henderson
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian Williams, Sr., Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bickham v. Henderson
as 2:2024cv10525
Plaintiff:
Martez Romal Bickham
Defendant:
Michael A Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bickham #777727 v. Henderson
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Martez Romal Bickham #777727
Defendant:
Michael A. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Garland et al
as 9:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael Joshua Henderson
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Anne Milgram, Dr. Robert Califf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company v. D.C.J.D. Corporation, et al
as 23-11438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
D.C.J.D. CORPORATION and MICHAEL BRANCH HENDERSON
HENDERSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00502
Petitioner:
MICHAEL C. HENDERSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
