Cases 1 - 10 of 249
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Abdallah v. Windhorst et al
as 2:2025cv03488
Plaintiff:
Rashad Mahmoud Abdallah
Defendant:
Andrew Windhorst, Lucas Searles, James Oden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Child Support Enforcement et al
as 1:2025cv02438
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Thomas and Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Child Support Enforcement, Westchester County Office of Child Support Services doing business as Title IV-D with its registered office, Eileen M Stack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Child Support Enforcement et al
as 1:2025cv00219
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Thomas and Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Child Support Enforcement, Westchester County Office of Child Support Services doing business as Title IV-D with its registered office, Eileen M Stack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Michael Thomas
as 24-2052
Defendant:
MICHAEL OSBORN THOMAS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
(PC) Thomas v. Srai
as 2:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Thomas
Defendant:
Meena Srai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Thomas v. Michael Kolhouse, et al
as 24-1351
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. THOMAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL KOLHOUSE and PARKER TROMLEY
Thomas v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Walter Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Thomas v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Thomas
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
