Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Campos v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2025cv02076
Plaintiff:
Alberto Campos
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, . Carson, . Bartucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laster v. Blanchette et al
as 2:2025cv02021
Plaintiff:
Jovaris Laster
Defendant:
. Blanchette, Jane Doe and Michael Downey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Downey et al
as 2:2025cv02002
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cortez Gomez
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Michael Downey and City of Kankakee Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Jensen et al
as 2:2024cv02281
Defendant:
Sheriff Michael Downey, Kankakee County, Deputy K. Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reed v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv02230
Defendant:
. Denault, . Memenga, Michael Downey and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv05908
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, Lieutenant Perkins, Michael Downey and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McLemore v. Downey
as 2:2024cv02105
Petitioner:
Kwatez Shadee McLemore
Respondent:
Michael Downey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitmore v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Whitmore
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, Michael Downey, Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garnett v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Barron Garnett
Defendant:
Michael Downey, Kankakee County, Jerome Combs Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILL v. VIOREL et al
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
STEVEN VIOREL, AUSTIN GILL, BLOCK BY BLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
