Cases 1 - 10 of 163
MYERS v. HOUSER et al
as 5:2025cv01412
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MYERS
Respondent:
HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF HEIDI EAUER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Connecticut Commission of Correction
as 25-502
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MYERS
Respondent:
CONNECTICUT COMMISSION OF CORRECTION
MYERS v. HOUSER
as 2:2025cv00857
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MYERS
Respondent:
HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeanty v. VanHorn et al
as 1:2025cv00823
Plaintiff:
Kervin R. Jeanty
Defendant:
Kiel VanHorn, Edward Broome, David Hoovler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Myers et al
as 8:2025cv00001
Defendant:
Stukes, Davenport, Fuhlrodt and others
Plaintiff:
DeRoise J. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv04331
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Knight et al v. Myers
as 8:2024cv00454
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Petitioner:
Phyllis M. Knight and Cotrell T. Knight
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Future Motion Incorporated
as 5:2024cv06129
Defendant:
Future Motion Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Myers v. Future Motion Incorporated
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Future Motion Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wudnuer v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 8:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Wubill Wudnuer and Kan Mar
Defendant:
Douglas County Department of Corrections, Hawshank, CO's and Seargants Involved and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
