Cases 1 - 10 of 1,154
Bal, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
as 25-656
Plaintiff:
DANA JAYE BAL and DONALD MICHAEL WILLIAMS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC.
United States of America v. Williams (Michael Williams)
as 25-124
Defendant:
Reverend MICHAEL WILLIAMS, XAVIER WILLIAMS, ELIJAH BOBBY WILLIAMS and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SLACK v. TUCKER et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Defendant:
KENNETH CINERESKI, MICHAEL WILLIAMS and CHRISTOPHER TUCKER
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE SLACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Wakefield et al
as 9:2024cv06949
Defendant:
Nurse Jermey, Head Nurse Shanna Peeler, Nurse J. Neely and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barton v. Khan et al
as 9:2024cv01433
Defendant:
Correction Officer John Does 1-3, Correction Officer Rohail Khan and Correction Officer Michael Williams
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 1:2024cv12886
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
John Anthony Williams v. Chuck Wright
as 24-7042
Defendant:
LT. BISHOP, Lt. of Spartanburg County Detention Center, SERGEANT CLAYTON, BMU, DEPUTY LONGE, BMU and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv81354
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kersey v. United States of America

as 2:2024cv00124
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Williams Kersey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Price et al
as 4:2024cv00696
Defendant:
Diversified Carriers, Inc. and Arnold Price
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.