Cases 1 - 10 of 30
(PC) Ruiz v. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv02757
Plaintiff:
Michael Rene Ruiz
Defendant:
R. St. Andre and Doug Herndon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
RUIZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04776
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWIN RUIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Tammy Yori v. Ruiz, et al
as 19-1090
Defendant / Appellee:
RONDA J. WINNECOUR, Chapter 13 Trustee
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMMY YORI
Undetermined:
In re: MICHAEL A. RUIZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00179
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Konrath v. Ruiz
as 1:2016cv10678
Defendant:
Miguel "Michael&q Ruiz
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tammy Yori v. Erie County Court of Common Pl, et al
as 15-2385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMMY YORI
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, Of Erie PA, ESTRANGE SPOUSE DPM. MICHAEL ANDREW RUIZ, a/k/a Miguel Andres Ruiz and others
Tammy Yori v. Stephanie Domitrovich, et al
as 15-2386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMMY YORI
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE STEPHANIE DOMITROVICH, Honorable, BRADLEY K. ENTERLINE and MICHAEL ANDREW RUIZ, DPM
Tammy Yori v. Erie County Court of Common Pl, et al
as 15-2192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMMY YORI
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, Of Erie PA, ESTRANGE SPOUSE DPM. MICHAEL ANDREW RUIZ, a/k/a Miguel Andres Ruiz and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
