Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Davis v. Wake County, North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Davis
Defendant:
Wake County, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reverend Beck v. William Barr, et al
as 24-1144
Plaintiff:
Reverend Beck, Phd
Defendant:
William P. Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Beck v. Barr et al
as 0:2023cv03863
Plaintiff:
Reverend Doctor Beck
Defendant:
William Pelham Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HODGES et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
PATROUSKI HODGES and NAKISHA WEST
Defendant:
MICHAEL NORTON DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. DABIS and MICHAEL L. DAVIS
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J Payne, Michael D King and James L Crowder
Defendant:
Michael C Davis, Nathan Rice and John W Staley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Brimmer et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Wislene Casy and others
Defendant:
Philip A. Brimmer, David DLG Atalig, Tom Kucharski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BECK v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv03659
Plaintiff:
BECK
Defendant:
WILLIAM PELHAM BARR, JOHN G. ROBERTS, RICHARD H. KYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dannez Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al
as 19-2293
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Doty, Ruben Castillo, James Rupert Murdoch and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dannez W. Hunter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
