Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Davis v. Claussan et al
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Brian Claussan, Matt Matthews and Shannon Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. ATL. Fulton Co. Judiciary et al
as 1:2022cv02726
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Davis
Defendant:
ATL. Fulton Co. Judiciary, Sheriffs Office, Atlanta Police Deptmt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Henderson
as 22-20035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael William Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Rand Henderson, Magistrate Paul Damico, Officer Rose and others
Davis v. Maginnis
as 22-20011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael William Davis, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Patty Maginnis, Judge, Adam McLane, District Attorney, Sophia Korndorffer, Attorney and others
Davis, Jr. v. Maginnis et al
as 4:2021cv02278
Plaintiff:
Michael William Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Patty Maginnis, Adam McLane, Sophia Korndorffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLoge v. Wyoming Supreme Court Chief Justice et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Wyoming Supreme Court Chief Justice, Wyoming Supreme Court Former Chief Justice, Michael K Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Steven A DeLoge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Montgomery County
as 4:2021cv01027
Plaintiff:
Michael William Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Henderson et al
as 4:2021cv01021
Plaintiff:
Michael William Davis
Defendant:
Officer Rose, Dr. Ather Siddiqi, Dr. Syed Zaidi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sipes v. Davis et al
as 6:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Michael D Davis and Elmer Beckworth
Plaintiff:
Kyle Robert Sipes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Henderson et al
as 4:2020cv04331
Plaintiff:
Michael William Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul Damico and Sheriff Rand Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
