Cases 11 - 20 of 37
USA v. Michael Davis
as 19-3652
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02478
Plaintiff:
Michael Stewart Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Davis v. USA
as 19-5632
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL EARL DAVIS
Davis v. Budish et al
as 1:2019cv00555
Defendant:
Emily McNeeley, Ken Mills, Eric Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Haas
as 2:2017cv14046
Petitioner:
Michael Terreal Davis
Respondent:
Randall Haas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Davis, et al v. Samunka Patel, et al
as 16-6406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DAVIS and JANICE CARVER DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUNKA PATEL, PINAL PATEL and MANISH KUMAR PATEL, individually and d/b/a REST HAVEN MOTEL
Davis v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00872
Petitioner:
Michael Earl Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dale et al v. Thunder Transport et al
as 1:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Deandre Sedrick Dale , Michael Jermaine Davis and Daniel Ryan Davis
Defendant:
Thunder Transport , Kamaljeet Singh-Sahota and Shunika T. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dale et al v. Transport et al
as 2:2016cv11442
Plaintiff:
Deandre Sedrick Dale , Michael Jermaine Davis and Daniel Ryan Davis
Defendant:
Thunder Transport , Kamaljeet Singh-Sahota and Shunika T. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
KMAG Holdings Group, Inc. et al v. J Phillip Chubb Insurance Agency et al
as 1:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
KMAG Holdings Group, Inc. , Michael J. Davies , PIU Management L.L.C and others
Defendant:
J Phillip Chubb Insurance Agency , J. Philip Chubb , Lexington Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
