Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00582
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Carr v. County Of Sullivan , New York et al
as 1:2016cv06850
Plaintiff:
James Carr
Defendant:
Sullivan County District Attorney's Office, Brendan Pavese, Travis Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Davis, et al v. City of Philadelphia
as 15-2937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLOBAL SALES CALL CENTER LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Richmond v. Brooklyn Center PD et al
as 4:2015cv04050
Plaintiff:
Courtney Richmond
Defendant:
Brooklyn Center PD, Hennepin County Jail, Hennepin County Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2014cv06979
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS and GLOBAL SALES CALL CENTER, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis v. San Francisco Jail
as 3:2014cv03063
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Davis
Defendant:
San Francisco Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Santa Rita Jail et al
as 3:2014cv01468
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Davis
Defendant:
Santa Rita Jail and County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv01852
Plaintiff:
Richard Muliek Kearney
Defendant:
Michael J. Davis, Charles E. Gleichman and Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
