Cases 1 - 10 of 512
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poling et al v. Two Rivers Mobile Home Coop, Board Members
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Arley J. Poling, Michael A. Davis and Vickie Parent
Defendant:
Two Rivers Mobile Home Coop, Board Members
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024mc00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
GP Transco Logistics LLC et al v. Emco Transportation, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
GP Transco Logistics LLC and Bradley Gruenke
Defendant:
Emco Transportation, LLC, Michael Elijah Davis, Gipson Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reverend Beck v. William Barr, et al
as 24-1144
Plaintiff:
Reverend Beck, Phd
Defendant:
William P. Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Davis v. Wake County, North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Davis
Defendant:
Wake County, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beck v. Barr et al
as 0:2023cv03863
Plaintiff:
Reverend Doctor Beck
Defendant:
William Pelham Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Davis v. Christopher Brun
as 23-6022
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER BRUN, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
