Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Michael Miles v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13351
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL K. MILES
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Miles v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv14196
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Miles
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael MilesIn re: Michael Miles
as 23-12124
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL N. MILES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Miles v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Michael David Miles
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
MILES v. SMITH
as 4:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
MICHAEL NIKIETH MILES
Respondent:
Warden TAMARSHE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. BC Entertainment, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00041
Defendant:
BC/Oasis Holding, LLC, Angel Salvador Romo, BC Entertainment, LLC d/b/a Oasis Lanes, d/b/a Oasis Lanes and Amusement Center, and d/b/a Frankie's Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Miles v. Young
as 2:2020cv14217
Defendant:
Warden G. Young
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miles v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2019cv14480
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
