Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Palmer v. The City of El Lago
as 4:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Palmer
Defendant:
The City of El Lago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael James Palmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PALMER v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv01329
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PAIGE PALMER
Respondent:
STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Palmer v. Phifer et al
as 1:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Michael Leonard Palmer
Defendant:
Officer Phifer, Other MARTA Police Officers and Officer Danielle Phifer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PALMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28694
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAN PALMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PALMER v. USA
as 1:2021cv00427
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EARL PALMER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aiello v. Brown
as 21-987
Defendant / Appellee:
Howard Brown, HiTouch Nashville LLC, Andrew Kovach and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael J. Palmer, Paul Swistak, Stuart Kaffee and others
Defendant:
Steven Chambers
Palmer v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv02561
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Palmer
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PALMER et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as 5:2020cv03689
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL G PALMER and CARRIE PALMER
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, GYNECARE, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Palmer et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Linda Gayle Palmer, Michael Paul Palmer and Beattyville Housing and Development Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
