Cases 1 - 10 of 136
WARFIELD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv01019
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JOHN WARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FAIRFIELD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00932
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DIANE FAIRFIELD
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
THOMAS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2013cv00048
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
DELANA L. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FARLEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00167
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CHERYL A. FARLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MOISTNER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00166
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
BARBARA D. MOISTNER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SORRELS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00116
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JADA D. SORRELS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
WELCH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00103
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ZULA M. WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ELLIOT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00090
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE E. ELLIOT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TREAT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00002
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
TERESA TREAT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
CHEEK v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01834
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
LISA A. CHEEK
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
