Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Panoply Holdings INC et al v. Bailey Sr et al
as 2:2023cv02736
Plaintiff:
Panoply Holdings INC and Michaelantonio Rivers
Defendant:
Javier Michael Bailey Sr, Bailey Company Realty Corporation, Angela Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael Bailey v. Johnny Fitz
as 23-5313
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHNNY FITZ, Warden
Bailey v. Mays
as 2:2022cv02343
Petitioner:
Michael Bailey
Respondent:
Tony Mays and Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Mays
as 3:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Michael Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01973
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Wayne v. Bailey
as 2:2013cv02361
Plaintiff:
Keith Laton Wayne
Defendant:
Javier Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Bridges
as 2:2013mc50367
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Bailey Bridges
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Orlando Bethel, et al v. Middletown City School Dist., et al
as 11-3652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO BETHEL and GLYNIS BETHEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOHN KASICH, Governor, In his individual and official capacity, GREG RASMUSSEN, Middletown City School District Superintendent, In his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
