Cases 1 - 10 of 141
BARNES v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC.
as 2:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARNES
Defendant:
RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Barnes et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Michael Barnes and Tamie Barnes
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corp, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
Michael Barnes and Michael Francis Barnes
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07793
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARNES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22069
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARNES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BARNES v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2022cv07268
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BARNES
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARNES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01708
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BARNES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
