Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bohannan v. Lumpkin
as 23-20468
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Bohannan
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bohannan v. Williams
as 23-40018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Bohannan
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Williams, TDCJ-CID Warden II, Anthony Newton, TDCJ-CID Warden I, Kevin Smith, TDCJ-CID Warden I and others
Bohannan v. Lumpkin
as 21-20367
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Bohannan
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bohannan v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00078
Petitioner:
Michael Bohannan
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bohannan v. Monroe et al
as 6:2020cv00315
Defendant:
Carol E Monroe and Deborah Cockrell
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannan v. Monroe et al
as 6:2020cv00506
Defendant:
Carol E. Monroe and Deborah Cockrell
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannan v. Redic et al
as 1:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Charles Rowry, Kevin Smith, Bryan Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannan v. Redic et al
as 6:2020cv00293
Defendant:
Unknown Garrett, Vickie Barrow, Timothy C Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannan v. Polk, et al
as 5:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Michael Bates, Balden Polk and Ralston Marshall
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Bohannan v. Wesley Griffin, et al
as 15-11217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BOHANNAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WESLEY GRIFFIN, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as CSOT Program Specialist, ALLISON TAYLOR, in individual capacity only, LISA WORRY, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as OVSOM Program Specialist and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
