Cases 1 - 10 of 28
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DOE #1, K. CRADDOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TROYA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
DANIEL TROYA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CRAWFORD v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CRAWFORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL and UNKNOWN NAMED TRUST FUND SUPERVISOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLADES et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BLADES and ANTWAN BUCHANAN
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
BIRON v. GEORGE et al
as 1:2021cv03307
Plaintiff:
LISA A. BIRON
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL and LINDSEY GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BRANKLE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. BRANKLE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BARB VON BLANKENSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATTLETON v. CARVAJAL
as 1:2021cv02899
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
