Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Cokes, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL COKES and ISIAH STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and DEAN W. EWING
United States of America v. Gray (Christopher Coke)
as 21-1932
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hughie Gray, AKA Hugh Goldson, AKA Michael Grant, Sharon Hinds, Lloyd Reid, AKA Kevin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Michael Coke, AKA President, AKA Michael Christopher Coke, AKA Paul Christopher Scott, AKA Shortman, AKA Duddus, AKA Presi, AKA General
Coke v. United States of America
as 19-233
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Coke
Respondent:
United States of America
Stevenson et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv04839
Plaintiff:
Isiah Stevenson and Michael Cokes
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Dean W Ewing , Village of Tinley Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald Gordon v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-1750
Petitioner:
DONALD GORDON, a/k/a Michael Coke, a/k/a Peter Gordon, a/k/a Timothy Knox, a/k/a Donald Wilson, a/k/a Donald Gordan, a/k/a Tim Knox, a/k/a Ronald Tait
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Coke v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv07533
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Coke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dickens et al v. Cook County et al
as 1:2013cv03336
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ellis Dickens
Defendant:
Cook County, Arlington Heights Police Department, William Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Gray
as 12-4441
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hughie Gray, AKA Hugh Goldson, AKA Michael Grant, Sharon Hinds, Lloyd Reid, AKA Kevin and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Christopher Michael Coke, AKA President, AKA Michael Christopher Coke, AKA Paul Christopher Scott, AKA Shortman, AKA Duddus, AKA Presi, AKA General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
