Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Charles Brown v. William Sprenkle, et al
as 19-3200
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL D. KLOPOTOSKI, LORI LYONS, JEROME WALSH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD BROWN
Montanez v. Keller et al
as 3:2013cv02564
Plaintiff:
Domingo Colon Montanez
Defendant:
Richard Keller, Bart Josefowicz, Kevin Miskell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Varano et al
as 1:2013cv01733
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pearson
Defendant:
David Varano, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Camp Hill et al
as 3:2010cv02612
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
Camp Hill, Central Office Executive Staff, William D. Sprenkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. KLOPOTOSKI et al
as 1:2010cv01964
Plaintiff:
Daniel Houston
Defendant:
Michael D. Klopotoski , The medical administrator, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keys v. Carroll et al
as 3:2010cv01570
Plaintiff:
Carrington Alan Keys
Defendant:
Jacqueline M. Carroll , Jeffrey A. Beard, - , Michael D. Klopotoski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Binkley v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv01245
Plaintiff:
Terry Binkley
Defendant:
Edward Rendell, Jeffrey A Beard, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. KLOPOTOSKI et al
as 2:2010cv01386
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HOUSTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. KLOPOTOSKI, THE MEDICAL ADMINISTRATOR, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Rendell et al
as 3:2010cv00505
Plaintiff:
Roberto C Rivera
Defendant:
Ed Rendell, Jeffrey Beard, James C Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Kale et al
as 1:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. McClain, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Kale, M.D., Lt. Bleich, Sgt. Muscial and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
