Cases
Disability Rights MS v. Fitch
as 23-60463
Plaintiff / Appellee: Disability Rights Mississippi, League of Women Voters of Mississippi, William Earl Whitley and others
Defendant / Appellant: Lynn Fitch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Michael D. Watson, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Mississippi
Disability Rights Mississippi et al v. Fitch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00350
Plaintiff: Disability Rights Mississippi, League of Women Voters of Mississippi, William Earl Whitley and others
Defendant: Lynn Fitch, Michael D. Watson, Jr., Gerald A. Mumford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff: Dana Ruby Bradley
Defendant: Wes Allen, Nancy Dahlstrom, Adrian Fontes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Parham et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv00572
Defendant: Lynn Fitch and Michael D. Watson, Jr.
Plaintiff: Jed Oppenheim, Mississippi State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P., League of Women Voters Mississippi and others
Amicus Curiae: The State of California, The State of New York, The State of Rhode Island and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00004
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Michael D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
First Security Bank et al v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00045
Plaintiff: First Security Bank and Michael D. Watson
Defendant: Santander Consumer USA, Inc. and Rickey Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?