Cases 1 - 10 of 21
GAYNOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84756
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL GAYNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAYNOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84338
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GAYNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11509
Plaintiff:
Norman Del Toro, James Baumert, James Meskill and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Debrosse v. The City of New York
as 17-2663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald Debrosse
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Detective Michael Gaynor, Tax# 928363, Detective David Arvelo, Tax# 895970 and others
Gaynor v. Taylor et al
as 1:2015cv00923
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Michael Gaynor
Defendant:
E. Taylor, Officer Savage and Ms. Sawyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaynor v. Naph Care et al
as 1:2015cv00924
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Michael Gaynor
Defendant:
Naph Care, H. McAstor and Ms. Oldecker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaynor v. The City of Chesapeake et al
as 1:2014cv00603
Petitioner:
Dwayne Michael Gaynor
Respondent:
The City of Chesapeake and Randall D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaynor v. Hatchett et al
as 1:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Michael Gaynor
Defendant:
Major Hatchett, Ms. Sawyers and Ofc. Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debrosse v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03822
Defendant:
Detective Robert Aiello, Detective David Arvelo, Police Officer Pablo Dejesus and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Debrosse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAYNOR v. BICKEL et al
as 2:2012cv05403
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GAYNOR
Respondent:
BICKEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
