Cases 1 - 10 of 47
MICHAEL GLOVER v. JOHN RIVELLO, et al
as 2:2023cv03247
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GLOVER
Respondent:
JOHN RIVELLO, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Walton et al
as 4:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Teri Evans
Defendant:
Scott Walton, Michael Glover, Unknown Rogers County Deputy Sheriffs 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Michael Glover
as 22-2824
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Glover, also known as Born Taleem Bey
US v. Michael Glover
as 22-6688
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL GLOVER, a/k/a Glove, a/k/a G, a/k/a HG, a/k/a Jihad Solohadeen Pollard
Oscar Garcia III et al v. Felipe Martinez Jr et al
as 2:2020cv10732
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Felipe Martinez, Jr., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Brown, III, Oscar Garcia, Michael Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Michael Glover
as 20-7435
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL GLOVER, a/k/a Glove, a/k/a G, a/k/a HG, a/k/a Jihad Solohadeen Pollard
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glover v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00811
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLOVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv39269
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glover v. USA
as 3:2020cv01231
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Glover v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00240
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
