Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Douvris v. Puna Geothermal Venture et al
as 1:2018cv00428
Defendant:
Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant:
Valve Service & Supply Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Puna Geothermal Venture
Plaintiff:
George Douvris, Cheryl Carocci, Michael Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Hale v. Mark Brnovich
as 18-16556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Ironworkers Local 808 et al v. Proweld, LLC
as 6:2018cv00810
Plaintiff:
Ironworkers Local 808 , Ironworkers Local Union 808 Pension Fund , Ironworkers Local Union 808 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Proweld, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ironworkers Local 808 et al v. Concrete Erectors, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00809
Plaintiff:
Ironworkers Local 808 , Ironworkers Local Union 808 Pension Fund , Ironworkers Local Union 808 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Concrete Erectors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HALE v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00180
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HALE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Brnovich
as 2:2017cv04537
Plaintiff:
Michael Hale
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hale v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00677
Petitioner:
Michael Hale
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hale v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00521
Petitioner:
Michael Hale
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hale et al v. Pan Am Railways, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10855
Plaintiff:
Michael Hale and Alla Hale
Defendant:
Pan Am Railways, Inc., Americold Logistics LLC and Cryo-Trans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00306
Petitioner:
Michael Hale
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
