Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brown v. Emanuele et al
as 2:2021cv01273
Plaintiff:
Tamar Brown
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Emanuele, Cpt Michael Hannah, CO Robert Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanis Solomon, Jr. v. Scott Sobek, et al
as 20-1679
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA MIKULECKY, SCOTT SOBEK, JOSHUA BRIGGS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANIS E. SOLOMON, JR.
Ennis Brown v. Michael Hannah, et al
as 20-1067
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HUBER, MARLON HANNAN, MICHAEL HANNAH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENNIS L. BROWN
Hannah v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2019cv01944
Defendant:
C/O Binko, Lombardo, Gouldie and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Lombardo et al
as 3:2019cv07023
Defendant:
Lombardo, Gouldie, Armendairiz and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2019cv01393
Defendant:
Lombardo and Armendairiz
Plaintiff:
Michael Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Review Journal et al
as 2:2019cv00345
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Sean Sprague, District Attorney Steven B. Wolfson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANNAH v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv00363
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HANNAH
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheney v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindsay Cheney, Jr
Defendant:
County of Butte, Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Butte, Kimberly Merrifield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Hannah et al
as 2:2016cv01420
Plaintiff:
Michael L Winston
Defendant:
Michael Hannah, Damon Camarata and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
