Cases 1 - 10 of 25
WOODRUFF v. HOLBROOK et al
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN L. WOODRUFF
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, BRYAN POTTER and MARK C. COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLBROOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23149
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCall v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2018cv01261
Defendant:
Nationstar, Carliesle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich Co., L.P.A., Bradley P. Toman and others
Plaintiff:
Bondary McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isreal v. Holbrook et al
as 2:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Isreal
Defendant:
Michael Holbrook and Maryellen O'Shaughnessy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holbrook v. Harlan, Kentucky et al
as 6:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Michael Holbrook
Defendant:
City of Harlan, Kentucky , City of Harlan Police Department , Danny Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holbrook v. SSA
as 5:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Michael Holbrook
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Michael Holbrook v. US
as 10-2355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, MARPAT Aviation, individually and as lessee of SUD Aviation - SNIAS (Aerospatiale) Alouette II Model SE-3130 Helicopter Serial Number 1133
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv03560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
