Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JONES v. STULEK et al
as 1:2012cv01210
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JONES
Defendant:
CJ STULEK and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Paul v. Michael Astrue
as 12-5028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William D. Paul
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Robert Matthews v. Michael Astrue
as 11-1055
Petitioner:
Robert R. Matthews
Respondent:
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
PAUL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00876
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. PAUL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS, INC. v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2010cv00499
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. SEBELIUS and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
VIEW v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
CHARLES VIEW, SR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chris Walters v. Michael Astrue, et al
as 09-5206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chris Walters
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue and Social Security Administration
Action Alliance of Sr. Citizen, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 09-5191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Action Alliance of Senior Citizens, Gray Panthers and Lucy Carolyn Loveall
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services and Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
EISENBERG v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2008cv01978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D.J. EISENBERG
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Joseph Smith v. Michael Astrue
as 08-5090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
