Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 91 - 100 of 852
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv05437
Plaintiff: MAKEISHA SMITH
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GARY v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05446
Plaintiff: NILE GARY
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MORRISON v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv05374
Plaintiff: TERESA DAVIES MORRISON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HAINES v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv05373
Plaintiff: CHARLES HAINES
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WASEM v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv05356
Plaintiff: BETH A. WASEM
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CAFFERY v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05360
Plaintiff: GEORGE CAFFERY
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
DUDA v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05361
Plaintiff: JEFFREY DUDA
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PFISTER v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05332
Plaintiff: MARY PFISTER
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
OSTRANDER v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv05333
Plaintiff: CATHLEEN ELIZABETH OSTRANDER
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DERRY v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv05289
Plaintiff: TONYIA M. DERRY
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?