Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,101
Haywood-Hovington v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv03043
Plaintiff: Dorothy Mae Haywood-Hovington
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nauman v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv03039
Plaintiff: Michael A Nauman
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stuckey v. Astrue et al
as 1:2012cv03044
Plaintiff: Andre Stuckey
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue and Social Sercurity Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03013
Plaintiff: Darrell W. Stewart
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Duffy v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03027
Plaintiff: Shawn Christopher Duffy
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dishroom v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02994
Plaintiff: Brian K. Dishroom
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Weems v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02993
Plaintiff: James A. Weems
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02992
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Stuart Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
James, Jr. v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02995
Plaintiff: Lucian C. James, Jr.
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Palma v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02997
Plaintiff: Teresa Virginia Palma
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?