Cases 1 - 10 of 42,219
Luginbyhl v. Astrue et al
as 5:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Douglas Shulman
Lilly v. Astrue
as 3:2022cv02247
Plaintiff:
Germany Lilly
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Hoch v. Astrue et al
as 8:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Hoch
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Adam Neidenberg, Kenneth LaVan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baluja v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv14180
Plaintiff:
Maria Baluja
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416
Vazquez v. Standford
as 19-2945
Defendant / Appellee:
Samuel D. Roberts, Commissioner (SSI), Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, or other acting in their official capacity, David Stukowy, Commissioner of Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Vazquez
Vazquez v. Astrue et al
as 5:2018cv01492
Defendant:
James Rescue Mission Personnel, Parole NYS, David Stukowy and others
Plaintiff:
Jose P. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoglund v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Keith Hoglund
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Edgar D Whitcomb, Mitch Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassel v. Astrue
as 3:2017cv05811
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Hassel
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robeson v. Astrue
as 1:2017cv05407
Plaintiff:
Mendel Tzvi Robeson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Collins v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00049
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Eric Kenneth Collins
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.