Cases 1 - 9 of 9
James v. USA
as 2:2021cv00113
Petitioner:
Philip Michael James
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James v. The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al
as 1:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Lance Hughes, The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2020cv00069
Plaintiff:
Michael James Sullivan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
O'Burke et al v. Hendersonville Hospital Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv01167
Plaintiff:
Randy O'Burke and Karen O'Burke
Defendant:
Clyde O. Southwell, M.D., Hendersonville Hospital Corporation, Jayesh A. Patel, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor
Campbell v. Knipper et al (PLR1)
as 2:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
Michael James Campbell
Defendant:
James Knipper, Linsey Lane, Mickey Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
Arthur Garrison
Defendant:
Robertson County, Tennessee and Michael James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company v. Christian Funeral Directors, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02103
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christian Funeral Directors, Inc., Joe Johnson, Clemente Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wofford v. Atkins et al
as 3:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
Michael James Wofford
Defendant:
Richard L. Atkins and Universal Am-Can, Ltd of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv01191
Petitioner:
Willie Michael James
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
