Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Lewis (ID 107555) v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
(fnu) Smith and Jennell L. Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis (ID 107555) v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Tommy Williams and Jennell L. Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01013
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
M Gutierrez and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARDLOW SR. v. FAW et al
as 1:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS WARDLOW, SR.
Defendant:
C.J. FAW, D.W. COPPOLA, J.M. REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Bechet, et al
as 2:2023cv05216
Plaintiff:
Joshua Joseph James
Defendant:
S. Bechet and Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis, Jason v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00223
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Lewis
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. US District Court Southern District Indiana Indianapolis
as 2:2023cv00421
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Lewis
Respondent:
US District Court Southern District of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
LEWIS v. US DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2023cv00539
Petitioner:
JASON MICHAEL LEWIS
Respondent:
US DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. LeMasters et al
as 7:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Respondent:
Warden LeMasters and Warden Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 5:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
