Cases 31 - 40 of 413
Lumsden et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden, Norman Horton, Benjamin Benson and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C.F. Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tumey, LLP, et al v. Mycroft AI, Inc., et al
as 23-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tumey, LLP and Tod T. Tumey
Defendant / Appellee:
Mycroft AI, Inc., Joshua Montgomery and Michael Lewis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 4:2022cv04371
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:19-cr-701-2.
as 4:2022cv04270
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Tubbs v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv12499
Plaintiff:
Robert Tubbs
Defendant:
Michael Lewis, James Anderson, M. Tank and others
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19157
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alario et al v. Kagle et al
as 6:2022cv05252
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Alario, Gerry John Lasseigne, Sr. and Gerry John Lasseigne, Sr
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Kagle, Kevin Raffield, K&B Trucking and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
