Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Lewis et al v. GC Getaways & Transfer Outlet et al
as 4:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Lewis, Mrs. Michelle Lewis, Michael Lewis and others
Defendant:
GC Getaways & Transfer and Mr. Matthew A. Voigt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 5:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden, Norman Horton, Benjamin Benson and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C.F. Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 4:2022cv04371
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:19-cr-701-2.
as 4:2022cv04270
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis et al v. Rosenberg Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv02593
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis and Regina Armstead
Defendant:
Rosenberg Police Department, City of Rosenberg, John Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02383
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00822
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendoza v. Michael Lewis Company
as 4:2021cv02469
Plaintiff:
Jose Mendoza
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Meudt et al
as 4:2021cv00556
Defendant:
Cpl. K. Howal, Officer E. Meudt and Bill Waybourn
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
