Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lott v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Michael Lott
Defendant:
Exactech Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lott v. Truist Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv02068
Defendant:
Truist Securities, Inc., Truist Financial Corp., Truist Bank, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lott
Fickel et al v. Lenn Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00864
Defendant:
Lenn Corporation and Stephen Michael Voglio
Plaintiff:
Michael Lott and Brandon Fickel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FILING ERROR
as 1:2020cv00861
Plaintiff:
Mark Michael Lott, Brandon Fickel and Michael Lott
Defendant:
Lenn Corporation and Stephen Michael Voglio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lott v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2019cv14010
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office and Joseph Lopinto
Plaintiff:
Michael Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER BROOK FISHBECK et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2018cv02248
Plaintiff:
BEATRIZ BELTRAN, RONALD EVERETT LOTT, RAMONA BELTRAN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN and others
Respondent:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Michael Lott v. Robert Tanner, Warden
as 14-30721
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden
Lott v. Colvin
as 8:2014cv01835
Plaintiff:
Michael Lott
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lott v. Tanner et al
as 2:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
Michael Lott
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
