Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv14204
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Kim Foxx, Michael Blaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL LOVE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Flynn, et al v. Jacqueline Love, et al
as 23-15540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. FLYNN and PHILIP H. STILLMAN
Intervenor Plaintiff:
REBECCA FLYNN-WILLIAMS, Successor Trustee of Laima Flynn Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LOVE, MICHAEL E. LOVE, an individual and as Trustee of the Michael Love Family Trust and MELENCO, INC., a Nevada corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Love v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02753
Petitioner:
Michael Love
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11903
Plaintiff:
CHANCE MICHAEL LOVE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHLACKS et al v. LOVE
as 2:2021mc00060
Plaintiff:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL LOVE
Petitioner:
DANIELLE SCHLACKS and JABBOK SCHLACKS
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10404
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael J Love and Michael Love
Defendant:
Ronald Neal, Tiffiny Turner, Buckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunbelt Rentals Inc v. Michael Love
as 21-1233
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL LOVE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUNBELT RENTALS INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
