Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Agen et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00837
Plaintiff: Mathew White, Jamie Agen, Debra Aikey and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ernest Parson, et al v. David Pierce, et al
as 19-1588
Plaintiff / Appellee: DAVID STEVENSON and ERNEST PARSON
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID PIERCE and CHRISTOPHER SENATO
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL MANLEY
Ernest Parson, et al v. David Pierce, et al
as 19-1558
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID PIERCE and CHRISTOPHER SENATO
Plaintiff / Appellee: ERNEST PARSON and MICHAEL MANLEY
MANLEY et al v. CONCELLI TOYOTA OF SPRINGFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv00069
Defendant: POTAMKIN TOYOTA, INC., POTAMKIN TOYOTA NORTH, INC., CONCELLI TOYOTA OF CONSHOHOCKEN and others
Plaintiff: ANGELA BAGLIONE and MICHAEL MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Phelps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00325
Plaintiff: Idris Young, Ernest Parson, Michael Manley and others
Defendant: Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond et al v. Phelps et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff: Abdul-Mafidh as Salafi, Christopher Desmond, Idris Young and others
Defendant: Perry Phelps, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Stevenson, et al v. Thomas Carroll We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1078
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID STEVENSON, MICHAEL MANLEY and MICHAEL L. JONES
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS CARROLL
Manley v. Danberg et al
as 1:2007cv00472
Petitioner: Michael Manley
Respondent: Carl C. Danberg and Thomas L. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?