Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Dailey v. Wellpath et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Sharon Dailey
Defendant:
Wellpath, Dinesh Nagar, Michael McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Woodland v. Bishop et al
as 2:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Rodney Woodland
Defendant:
Cyndia Bishop, James Blanch and Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharon Austin, et al v. University of Florida Board of Trustees, et al
as 23-13754
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHARON WRIGHT AUSTIN, MICHAEL MCDONALD, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PRESIDENT OF UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, PROVOST, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA and others
Lewis v. Riverview, City of et al
as 5:2023cv12531
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Gail Lewis
Defendant:
Riverview, City of, Matthew Lyles and Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDONALD v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
TRASHAWN MICHAEL MCDONALD
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McDonald v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv01241
Petitioner:
Trashawn Michael McDonald
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McDonald v. Warden, Terre Haute FCI
as 6:2023cv01250
Petitioner:
Trashawn Michael McDonald
Respondent:
Warden, Terre Haute FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Dailey v. Ellis et al
as 2:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Sharon N. Dailey
Defendant:
John B. Ellis, Jeffrey Steven Daley, Mason Minent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDONALD v. STEWART
as 3:2023cv06471
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL MCDONALD
Defendant:
SHIRL STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
