Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McNeil v. ESP Executive Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Defendant:
ESP Executive Staff, James Dzurenda, William Gitterre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Gittere et al
as 3:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Sgt. Matthew Roman, Deputy Director Harold Wickham, Sgt. Dennis Homan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil v. Gittere et al
as 3:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Dennis Homan, William Gittere, Darid Drummond and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) McNeil v. Toor et al
as 1:2019cv01257
Defendant:
Pal Virk, Tin-Aung Shwe, Kiran Toor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil v. Molnar et al
as 2:2018cv01594
Defendant:
Quentin Byrne, Investigator General, Sgt William Glass and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Villano
as 17-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
MCNEIL v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2015cv02795
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCNEIL
Respondent:
FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SETH WILLIAMS PHILA, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliphant v. Villano
as 14-1077
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Villano
Oliphant v. Villano
as 14-1069
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Robert Villano
Michael McNeil v. Ortiz Singh
as 13-16059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEIL
Defendant - Appellee:
ORTIZ SINGH, M.D.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
