Cases 81 - 90 of 211
Williams v. Minev et al

as 3:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael Minev, R. Donnelly, B. Egerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarrette v. Daniels et al

as 2:2022cv00990
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A Navarrette
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Michael Minev, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Perri et al

as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Nick Morton
Defendant:
R. Perri, Charles Daniels, Perrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al

as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hano v. Minev et al
as 3:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
David Hano
Defendant:
Michael Minev, Brian Williams, John Faulkner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Flamm et al

as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant:
Flamm, Lance White, Barraza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Gutierrez et al

as 2:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
Ben Gutierrez, Sonya Carrillo, Peret and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DePetro v. Minev

as 2:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Frank DePetro
Defendant:
Michael Minev, HDSP Medical Nursing Staff and Nurse Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hermanson v. Minev et al

as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Hermanson
Defendant:
Michael Minev, John Keast and Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 22-15548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.