Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MOREL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48953
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOREL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2020cv01357
Defendant:
Chad Haase, Deputy Ryan Schwartz, Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Gary B Campbell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morel et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv01348
Not Classified By Court:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Morel
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1343
Daniel Garcia v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 2:2019cv09807
Defendant:
Michael Morel, United States Postal Service, Does 1-100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Thorpe, Dekator v. Morell, Michael et al
as 3:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
Dekator Matthew Thorpe
Defendant:
Michael Morell and Dale J. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Janssen Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
Michael Morel Hudson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDSON v. JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as GAM/5:15-cv-00017
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOREL HUDSON
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC , JANSSEN ORTHO LLC , JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
HUDSON v. JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOREL HUDSON
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEIDRICK v. BARACK OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv00944
Plaintiff:
MARY JO WEIDRICK
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, WILLIAM CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00457
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
