Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Almy v. Leavitt
as 1:2008cv01245
Plaintiff:
Monique D. Almy
Defendant:
Michael O. Leavitt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Beverly Healthcare Lumberton v. Michael Leavitt
as 08-1447
Petitioner:
BEVERLY HEALTHCARE LUMBERTON
Respondent:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Integon National Insurance Company v. Berry et al
as 5:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Integon National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lester Berry, Carolina Orthopedic Specialists, Michael O Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chawla v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jay Chawla
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael O Leavitt, George W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chawla v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv00298
Plaintiff:
Jay Chawla
Defendant:
USA, Michael B. Mukasey, Michael O. Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chawla v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jay Chawla
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael O Leavitt, Condoleezza Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-2140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Good Samaritan Hospital Of Maryland, Inc. et al v. Leavitt
as 1:2007cv02943
Plaintiff:
The Good Samaritan Hospital Of Maryland, Inc. and Franklin Square Hospital Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael O. Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Comer v. Leavitt
as 7:2007cv03193
Plaintiff:
Betty Comer
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
