Cases 1 - 10 of 10
POWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53579
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL POWERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45159
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33183
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiand v. Adamek et al
as 8:2021cv00360
Defendant:
Stephen Cooper, Cynthia Duckett, Kathryn Shively and others
Plaintiff:
Burton W. Wiand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Powers et al v. Sig Sauer, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv02026
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc., Dana Safety Supply, Inc. and L&O SIG SAUER VERWALTUNGS-GMBH
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Powers and Tammy Lee Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38690
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25395
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33426
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Robinson v. Michael Power
as 12-15356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DARRELL ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL POWERS, Detective
ROBINSON v. ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DARRELL ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL POWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
