Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Berry et al v. Flint et al
as 5:2017cv10717
Plaintiff:
Jeff Berry and S.B.
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
v. Wurfel et al
as 2:2017cv10701
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Liane Shekter Smith, Adam Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Scroggins et al v. Flint et al
as 5:2017cv10710
Plaintiff:
Amy Scroggins , A.S.1 , A.S.2 and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Mosley et al v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10686
Plaintiff:
Ashley Mosley , A.T. and A.H.
Defendant:
City of Flint, Howard Croft, Michael Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
KEYES et al v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10699
Plaintiff:
TYREE KEYES and A.K.
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ATOU et al v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10703
Plaintiff:
ZENA ATOU , A.A.1. , A.A.2. and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HUNTLEY et al v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10692
Plaintiff:
SHANTEE HUNTLEY , J.R. and L.R.
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
YOUNG et al v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10687
Plaintiff:
CHINIKA YOUNG , C.Y. , S.T. and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
v. Wurfel et al
as 2:2017cv10700
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Liane Shekter Smith, Adam Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gulla et al v. Wells, M.D. et al
as 2:2017cv10709
Plaintiff:
Hazim Gulla , Ikhalas Gulla , Healther Gulla and others
Defendant:
Eden Victoria Wells, M.D., Stephen Busch , Liane shekter-smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.