Cases 21 - 30 of 560
Indigenous Environmental Network et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2020cv00115
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, David Bernhardt, United States Department of State and others
Plaintiff:
Indigenous Environmental Network and North Coast Rivers Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Individual #1 v. Blinken
as 20-20626
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary, U.S. Department of State, Daniel Bennett Smith, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of State and Anthony Blinken, Secretary, U.S. Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Individual #1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Reuter et al v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2020cv02180
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dawson Reuter and Dulce Victoria Galindo Felix
Defendant:
Michael R. Pompeo, Chad F Wolf, Eric S. Cohan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02312
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SOROKIN v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv03373
Defendant:
CHAD F. WOLF, MICHAEL R. POMPEO and CATHERINE HOLT
Plaintiff:
YURIY SOROKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv03357
Defendant:
CHAD F. WOLF, MICHAEL R. POMPEO and CATHERINE HOLT
Plaintiff:
YURIY SOROKIN and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
